a) Plot the observed major and minor axis surface brightness profiles for the bulge, disk, and total light (all on the same plot; surface brightness in mag/ss from 30 to 14 vs angular scale in arcminutes from 0 to 9). For the major axis, show where light is contributed by the bulge and disk in the ratios 1:5, 1:1, 5:1.
b) For both plots, show a typical B-band surface brightness for a dark night sky, and the "limiting radius" corresponding to a surface brightness µ = 26.5 mag/ss. What is the minor to major axis ratio measured at this limiting surface brightness? Why does this not naively yield an inclination of 60 degrees?
c) The total flux from the de Vaucouleurs bulge is L_{tot} 7.22 R_{e}^{2} I(R_{e}). What is L_{tot} for a face-on exponential disk with central surface brightness I(0) [do the integral]? By what factor does a dust-free disk appear brighter when it is tilted by i degrees from face-on? Hence, for our galaxy disk, what is the face-on central brightness, µ_{c}(0), and what is the integrated bulge to disk flux ratio?
(2) 2-D Velocity Fields :
b) What is the projected Doppler velocity for a point in the galaxy disk with circular velocity V_{c} and radial velocity V_{r} (+ve away from the nucleus), both in the plane of the galaxy?
c) On a simple 200 x 200 cartesian computational grid, use a contouring routine to generate "spider diagrams" (iso-projected velocity contours at intervals of 20 km/s) for the following velocity fields for a circular galaxy of radius 100 units, tipped through 60^{o} (label or color-code the contours, and indicate the zero velocity contour, which defines the kinematic minor axis) :
d) For each of the velocity fields above, plot the integrated HI profile assuming that the galaxy fits within the HI telescope beam and has uniform surface HI density out to R = 100, but none beyond.
(3) Tully Fisher Relation :
a) Briefly outline a theoretical justification for expecting a relation between the luminosity of spiral galaxies and their rotation amplitudes of the form L V^{4} (note: the same justification applies for the Faber-Jackson relation for spheroids: L ^{4}) . What additional constraints must hold for this relation to be valid?
b) A spiral galaxy with redshift cz = 7080 km/s has inclination i = 45^{o}, corrected apparent magnitude B_{T}^{o,i} = 13.3, and observed (semi-) rotation speed V_{rot} = 180 km/s. What's the true inclination-corrected full rotation amplitude, W? Use the Tully-Fisher relation M_{B} = -7.41(log W - 2.5) - 20.04 to infer the galaxy's absolute magnitude, M_{B}, and hence its distance modulus, and distance in Mpc. Adopting H_{0} = 72 km/s/Mpc, what is the peculiar velocity of this galaxy?
c) If the optical rotation curve extends to 1.2 arcmin, use the Newtonian relation M(< R) = R V^{2} / G with geometry factor = 0.7, to estimate the mass-to-light ratio out to 1.2 arcmin. Is this reasonable for a typical spiral stellar population? If HI observations extend this velocity measurement out to 8 arcmin, what's the new mass-to-light ratio (use = 1.0 for a spherical halo)? Is this reasonable for a typical stellar population?