|
Given three objects, each of which may be a point, line, or circle,
draw a circle that is tangent to each. There are a total of ten cases. The two easiest
involve three points or three lines, and
the hardest involves three circles.
Euclid solved the two easiest cases in his Elements, and the others (with
the exception of the three circle problem),
appeared in the Tangencies of Apollonius which was, however, lost. The general
problem is, in principle, solvable by straightedge
and compass alone.
The three-circle problem was solved by Viète (Boyer 1968), and the solutions are called Apollonius circles. There are eight total solutions. The simplest
solution is obtained by solving the three simultaneous quadratic equations
 |
(1)
|
 |
(2)
|
 |
(3)
|
in the three unknowns , , for the eight triplets
of signs (Courant and Robbins 1996). Expanding the equations gives
 |
(4)
|
for , 2, 3. Since the first term is the
same for each equation, taking and gives
 |
(5)
|
 |
(6)
|
where
and similarly for , , and (where the 2
subscripts are replaced by 3s). Solving these two simultaneous linear equations gives
which can then be plugged back into the quadratic equation (1) and solved using the quadratic
formula.
Perhaps the most elegant solution is due to Gergonne. It proceeds by locating the six homothetic centers (three
internal and three external) of the three given circles.
These lie three by three on four lines (illustrated above). Determine the inversion poles of one of these with respect to each of the
three circles and connect the inversion poles with the radical
center of the circles. If the connectors
meet, then the three pairs of intersections are the points of tangency of two of
the eight circles (Petersen 1879, Johnson 1929, Dörrie 1965). To determine which
two of the eight Apollonius circles are produced by the three pairs, simply take
the two which intersect the original
three circles only in a single point
of tangency. The procedure, when repeated, gives the other three pairs of circles.
If the three circles are mutually tangent, then the eight solutions collapse to two, known as the Soddy circles.
Larmor (1891) and Lachlan (1893, pp. 244-251) consider the problem of four circles having a common tangent circle.
Altshiller-Court, N. College Geometry: A Second Course in Plane Geometry for Colleges
and Normal Schools, 2nd ed., rev. enl. New York: Barnes and Noble, p. 226,
1952.
Boyer, C. B. A History of Mathematics. New York: Wiley, p. 159,
1968.
Courant, R. and Robbins, H. "Apollonius' Problem." §3.3 in What Is Mathematics?: An Elementary Approach to Ideas and Methods,
2nd ed. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, pp. 117 and 125-127,
1996.
Dörrie, H. "The Tangency Problem of Apollonius." §32 in 100
Great Problems of Elementary Mathematics: Their History and Solutions. New
York: Dover, pp. 154-160, 1965.
F. Gabriel-Marie. Exercices de géométrie. Tours, France:
Maison Mame, pp. 18-20 and 663, 1912.
Gauss, C. F. Werke, Band 4. New York: George Olms, p. 399, 1981.
Gergonne, M. "Recherche du cercle qui en touche trois autres sur une sphère."
Ann. math. pures appl. 4, 1813-1814.
Johnson, R. A. Modern Geometry: An Elementary Treatise on the Geometry of the
Triangle and the Circle. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, pp. 118-121,
1929.
Lachlan, R. "Circles with Touch Three Given Circles" and "Systems of Four Circles Having a Common Tangent Circle." §383-396 in An Elementary Treatise on Modern Pure Geometry. London:
Macmillian, pp. 241-251, 1893.
Larmor, A. "Contacts of Systems of Circles." Proc. London Math. Soc. 23,
136-157, 1891.
Ogilvy, C. S. Excursions in Geometry. New York: Dover, pp. 48-51,
1990.
Pappas, T. The Joy of Mathematics. San Carlos, CA: Wide World Publ./Tetra,
p. 151, 1989.
Petersen, J. Example 403 in Methods and Theories for the Solution of Problems of Geometrical
Constructions, Applied to 410 Problems. London: Sampson Low, Marston, Searle
& Rivington, pp. 94-95, 1879.
Rouché, E. and de Comberousse, C. Traité de géométrie plane. Paris:
Gauthier-Villars, pp. 297-303, 1900.
Salmon, G. Conic Sections, 6th ed. New York: Chelsea, pp. 88-135,
1960.
Simon, M. Über die Entwicklung der Elementargeometrie im XIX. Jahrhundert.
Leipzig: Teubner, pp. 97-105, 1906.
Wells, D. The Penguin Dictionary of Curious and Interesting Geometry.
London: Penguin, pp. 4-5, 1991.
|