|
||||||
|
|
|||||
Chapter 16 Questions |
||||||
 |
Don't those who want Omega = 1 land themselves in the same predicament as Einstein who required perfect initial conditions to hold the universe static? To assume Omega=1 is to assume there is a god who would account for these special conditions? |
 |
Actually those who want Omega=1 are trying to avoid special conditions by positing something physical that happened to force the universe into the special state of Omega=1, no matter how it began. This is an important consequence of the inflationary model. |
|
Why do we need to have an inflationary model of the universe. Does it explain the expansion of the universe better than other models? |
|
The inflationary model attempts to explain why the universe appears so homogeneous and isotropic and so flat. In the standard model these conditions have to be built into the initial conditions. In the inflationary addition to the standard model these conditions arise as a result of the inflationary epoch. |
|
Given inflation at the beginning of this universe describes a period of rapid accelerated universal expansion, which slowed, why is universal expansion accelerating again? |
|
In either case the source of the acceleration is what is referred to in the Einstein field equations as the cosmological constant term, Lambda, or dark energy. Several interpretations can be given to the cosmological constant - in inflation it is a vacuum energy density. Any present dark energy could also be caused by a vacuum energy density which has a value different from that during inflation. Or it could be caused by something else that acts like a negative energy density. |
|
In the big bang, the inflationary epoch caused the expansion of fluctuations into various galaxies and the like we see today. Is it possible that fluctuations actually expanded into multiple universes? |
|
In the chaotic inflation model other fluctuations could have expanded in to other universes. |
|
Is there any way to know about a universe existing outside our light cone? |
|
Only by inference from what we can learn from events inside our past light cone. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copyright © 2005 John F. Hawley |